<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Cisco NetPro - <![CDATA[Firewalling]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=&amp;topic=&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_messages%26mode%3Dnew%26location%3D.ee6e1fa</link>
<description><![CDATA[&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;bodytext&quot;&gt;Securing your business network]]></description>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 07:16:33 PST</lastBuildDate>
<generator>CCSF</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[global NAT - now need some dynamic policy NAT]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc07da7</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi,

We've got a global NAT rule
static (inside,outside) interior-192.168.0.0 interior-192.168 netmask 255.255.0.0 

But now we need some dynamic policy NAT:
access-list inside_nat_outbound line 1 extended permit ip 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 host 217.77.27.188 

global (outside) 1 193.14.22.1-193.14.22.10 netmask 255.0.0.0

The problem is, when we connect to the external network where we need to be natted (217.77.27.188) we always fall on the global NAT rule. Which is needed for other purpose.

Is there a way to use the global NAT rule but also use a dynamic policy NAT but with same networks?

searchrail
]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc07da7</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 07:14:49 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[DHCP pools on ASA 5510/5520]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc07f58</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi. I cant seem to figure out how to have a dhcp pool for inside users that is a different subnet than what the inside interface is.
For example, inside interface is 10.0.0.1/24 but I want dhcp pool to be 10.1.0.1/24   Honestly, this is for a customer and I dont know his reasoning behind it, so I cant address that.

I read this document: &lt;A HREF=&quot;javascript:newWin('http://cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa71/configuration/guide/ip.html')&quot;&gt;http://cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa71/configuration/guide/ip.html&lt;/A&gt;
And it didnt tell me I could or couldnt do it.  Am I just missing something?

Thanks!
]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc07f58</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 07:07:30 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Excessive UDP teardown]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc0736b</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hello can a pix generate a UDP teardown without a subsequent UDP setup.  I am seeing excessive teardown on the network.  Trying to find out the cause.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc0736b</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 07:05:22 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[asa5505 nat pat configurations help.]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc08398</link>
<description><![CDATA[This is my network configuration:

interface Vlan1
 nameif inside
 security-level 100
 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan2
 nameif outside
 security-level 0
 ip address 192.168.0.7 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan12
 no forward interface Vlan1
 nameif dmz
 security-level 50
 ip address 192.168.2.254 255.255.255.0
!

There must be a communication: 
from any inside host -&gt; to outside.
from any dmz host -&gt; to outside.
from any inside host -&gt; to dmz.

using pat 
from any outside to some services in inside servers.
these configurations are ok, 
but i'm not able to communicate from some servers in dmz to some inside servers which e.g. use smpt, pop3 protocol.



access-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp any host 192.168.0.12 object-group Linuxsrv_servizi
access-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp any host 192.168.0.8 object-group Mailsrv1_servizi
access-list outside extended permit tcp any host 192.168.0.12 eq www
access-list inside_access_in extended permit icmp 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 any
access-list inside_access_in extended permit tcp 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 any
access-list dmz_access_in extended permit tcp host linuxsrv any eq www
access-list dmz_access_in extended permit tcp host websrv any eq www
access-list dmz_access_in extended permit ip 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
access-list dmz_access_in extended permit icmp 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 any
access-list dmz_access_in extended permit udp 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 any eq domain
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is my nat configuration.
global (outside) 1 192.168.0.8 netmask 255.255.255.0
nat (inside) 0 access-list inside_nat0_outbound
nat (inside) 1 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
static (inside,outside) tcp 192.168.0.8 www 192.168.1.201 www netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp 192.168.0.8 5500 192.168.1.132 5500 netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp 192.168.0.8 smtp 192.168.1.201 smtp netmask 255.255.255.255
static (dmz,outside) 192.168.0.12 linuxsrv netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,dmz) 192.168.2.0 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0

access-group inside_access_in in interface inside
access-group outside_access_in in interface outside
access-group dmz_access_in in interface dmz
route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.254 1

Shall i make another nat rule, e.g. from inside to dmz?
i tried to make it but i always get an error.. &quot;this rule is overlapping an existent nat rule&quot;
static (inside,dmz) 192.168.2.0 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0

Could you please tell me where I am wrong?



Kind regards]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc08398</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 07:05:22 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[PIXEOS Migration Tool]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc083ba</link>
<description><![CDATA[On a Techwise Podcast on Mar 10, 2008 - Per  Hagen spoke about the PIXEOS migration tool.  I was wondering if the tool has been published yet?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc083ba</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 05:58:14 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Fixup command and VOIP]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc083b2</link>
<description><![CDATA[hi all,

We recently implemented VOIP on one of our sites, the main callmanager is in the head office and all traffic goes through a PIX 515. The VOIP phone would get the correct IP address from DHCP but simply didnt work properly. After removing the fixup h232 command it started working fine, can someone pls explain exactly what fixup does and how removing it fixed the prob? Thanks in advance.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc083b2</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 05:50:57 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Remote access VPN problem]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc08376</link>
<description><![CDATA[My remote access client are not able to ping inside network. 

my concentrator is connected with core switch.

My 172.28.31.171 is also connected in core switch. InterVLN routing is working fine. server and conncentrator is 

able to reach other via core switch.


concentrator private Ip address 172.28.31.92/248
Public IP address:  208.74.112.157
VPN POOL:  172.28.31.128/248


Split tunnel is enable for 172.28.0.0/16, 172.29.0.0/16.



Routing on concentrator is 
172.28.0.0/16 is connected via 172.28.31.91
172.29.0.0/16 is connected via 172.28.31.91


Core switch Ip address is 172.28.31.91
Core switch also has the route 
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.28.31.85
ip route 10.0.0.0 255.255.224.0 172.28.31.68
ip route 10.11.0.32 255.255.255.224 172.28.31.68
ip route 172.28.0.0 255.255.0.0 172.28.31.68
ip route 172.28.0.0 255.255.224.0 172.28.31.77
ip route 172.28.31.128 255.255.255.248 172.28.31.92
ip route 172.29.0.0 255.255.0.0 172.28.31.68
ip route 172.31.205.224 255.255.255.224 172.28.31.68
ip route 192.168.249.0 255.255.255.0 172.28.31.68
ip route 192.168.250.0 255.255.255.0 172.28.31.68,

 




As u have tested you are able to connect  but not able to reach anywhere, though from internal network I can ping your vpn IP 172.28.31.129.



In VPN session i can see sometimes bytes send and receive, and sometime only sending no recving. 



No firewall involoved in the path between the concentrator and desired server 172.28.31.171.



Both connected on same switch but different VLAN. but Inter VLAN routing is working and both are able to ping.



ONly remote access client 172.28.31.128/248 is not able to reach anywhere. 


VPN concentrator has public default filter on public interface and private filter on local interface.
]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc08376</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 04:14:11 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Max Number of VPNGroup on ASA]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc08361</link>
<description><![CDATA[We have a client who wishes to configure upwards of 250 vpngroups for different schools and remote support companies. Do you know the maximum for ASA5510-SEC model? I thought of ACS server controlling ACL's, but I need to answer this question.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc08361</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 04:11:58 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[P2P and IM blocking with ASA 5520 using GUI]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc0836d</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,

We have an ASA 5520 working since somedays, and we want now to block IM and P2P network traffic through our firewall. We asked our distributor and they send us a link: &lt;A HREF=&quot;javascript:newWin('http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00808c38a6.shtml')&quot;&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00808c38a6.shtml&lt;/A&gt;

In this link we have information about blocking such traffic by modifying directly in the running-config file. Our question is whether we can find or not a way to do it using the GUI. We will fell safer if we do it like this.

In case there is no chance to do it through GUI, how should I proceed to modify running-config file.

Thank you.

]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc0836d</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 03:59:40 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Cisco VPN Client error]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc07d55</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi, When I try to connect VPN by using Cisco VPN client then I am getting this exception error &quot;error 403, can not contact security gateway&quot;. Please advise.. Thanks]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc07d55</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 01:39:56 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How to upgrade PIX 7.x without downtime]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc07e69</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi Guys,

     Please enlighten me how to do a &quot;zero downtime upgrade&quot; without rebooting my machine. Is there any other command that i need to issue other than &quot;reload&quot;? 

Please help me.

Thanks,
Jong


]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc07e69</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 01:22:59 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[ASA 5520 Rebooting Automatically -Urgent]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc08318</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi,

I have cisco ASA 5520.It was working fine without any problem.But from yesterday it is rebooting automatically after every 2-3 minutes.I have remoed it from network and check it at that time it was not rebotting.
What might be the problem?is it any hardware isssue?please assist to resolve this issue..

Thanx,
som]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc08318</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 00:32:57 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Unblae to communicate on SFTP port (Port No 22) between different VLANs]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc07c02</link>
<description><![CDATA[I am having following trouble..

Source IP from where he is trying to SFTP: 10.254.227.* (DMZ VLAN)

Destination IP: 10.254.230.* where we need access(Also a VLAN)

There is a Checkpoint and PIX firewall on which access-lists are configured.

On checking logs on both firewalls the SFTP is permitted.

We tested it many times from command prompt but connections fails saying 'Connection failed on port 22'

For eg: &gt;telnet ip address 22

Tried to telnet from server (ip 10.254.227.*) to (10.254.230.*)

We tried telnetting on port 22 first and then 21 also but no joy.

Can someone give some ideas as what could be preventing the connection?

I have checked logs on Checkpoint and it says request accepted when I am sending request from 10.254.227.x using FileZilla software to connect to another server which is in different VLAN (10.254.230.x). 
I have found that on cisco PIX, traffic is getting accepted but its not going to the appropriate destination. 
Pls check my following logs from CISCO PIX

For PIX firewall it seems like address translation issue.

We have got log from PIX firewall as follows

****************************************

2008-05-07 21:31:29 Local6.Info 192.168.1.1 %ASA-6-106100: access-list Outside-inbound permitted tcp Outside/10.254.227.*(3882) -&gt; OperWebMgmt/10.254.230.*(22) hit-cnt 1 first hit

2008-05-07 21:31:29 Local6.Error 192.168.1.1 %ASA-3-305005: No translation group found for tcp src Outside:10.254.227.*/3882 dst OperWebMgmt:10.254.230.*/22

***************************************

Looks to us like PIX is allowing to make inbound connection but not able to make it out towards destination.

There is a route between both VLAN's.

Due to security reasons ping and tracert are disabled.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc07c02</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 May 2008 21:39:26 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[export]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc07599</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi All,
   I want to export my fw configuration in to .xls or .csv format. Kindly help me
Thank you
Vijay K]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc07599</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 May 2008 20:31:30 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[VPN map ACL and Routing on ASA]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc082a4</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi, 

I have a question on VPN map access list and routing in ASA. 
I am considering a scenario of an ASA firewall with VPN tunnel configured for outside interface and has static or dynamic routing running. 
An access list defines match for incoming traffic from inside interface. Matching traffic will be sent on the VPN tunnel. But what if I have a static route/dynamic route (respective of AD) that gives an exit way to the same traffic through some other interface (e.g. DMZ)? 

Which will take preference here, the VPN map ACL or the routing table and why? Will the AD in the routing table affect selection between VPN and exit interface? Let’s say static route will be on top of everything and traffic won’t flow through the VPN tunnel. 
Against what the traffic will be matched first? VPN map or routing table? I think it is access list then routing. 

Actually I am trying to use this for failover between a direct connection through a middle interface and a VPN tunnel. 


Thanks... 
Kapish
]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc082a4</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 May 2008 20:16:44 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Asyncronous routing within Active Standby ASA pair]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc07fb9</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi
I have 2 pairs of ASA5520's one pair at my Head Office the other pair at my DR site. they are configured as Active Standby Pairs at each site with a vpn tunnel between the two sites.
I have traffic that originates off one of the interfaces on the ASA but arrives back in on a different interface.
Will the ASA support this? 
I have VPN's from my field sites that needed to come in and go out on the same interface so I have configured the same-security-traffic permit intra-interface for them but my WAN has some asyncronous routing that allows traffic to come in on a different interfacethan it went out on.

Please Help]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc07fb9</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 May 2008 20:16:35 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[delayed http dns lookups]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc08293</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi,

This is a problem that I can't seem to resolve, and TAC couldn't help with either. Everytime I browse the web, my DNS lookups seem to be delayed and can sometimes take up to a minute before the lookup is done and the web page returns. This is on a 5505 for my small business and I can put linux and os x boxes behind it and they all have the same problem. 

Anyone have any ideas on how find this problem? Any help much appreciated.

winky# sh run
: Saved
:
ASA Version 7.2(3) 
!
hostname winky
domain-name network.local
enable password ************** encrypted
names
name 192.168.1.0 INSIDE
!
interface Vlan1
 nameif inside
 security-level 100
 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 
!
interface Vlan2
 nameif outside
 security-level 0
 ip address dhcp setroute 
!
interface Ethernet0/0
 switchport access vlan 2
!
interface Ethernet0/1
!
interface Ethernet0/2
!
interface Ethernet0/3
!
interface Ethernet0/4
!
interface Ethernet0/5
!
interface Ethernet0/6
!
interface Ethernet0/7
!
passwd ***************** encrypted
banner motd 
ftp mode passive
dns domain-lookup inside
dns server-group DefaultDNS
 name-server 73.214.34.205
 name-server 68.87.85.98
 domain-name network.local
pager lines 24
logging asdm informational
mtu inside 1500
mtu outside 1500
icmp unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
asdm image disk0:/asdm-523.bin
no asdm history enable
arp timeout 14400
global (outside) 1 interface
nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
timeout xlate 3:00:00
timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
timeout sunrpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 1:00:00 mgcp 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
timeout sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 sip-invite 0:03:00 sip-disconnect 0:02:00
timeout uauth 0:05:00 absolute
http server enable
http INSIDE 255.255.255.0 inside
no snmp-server location
no snmp-server contact
snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkup linkdown coldstart
telnet 192.168.1.11 255.255.255.255 inside
telnet timeout 10
ssh INSIDE 255.255.255.0 inside
ssh timeout 10
console timeout 0
dhcpd auto_config outside
!
dhcpd address 192.168.1.20-192.168.1.40 inside
dhcpd enable inside
!

!
!
username pinky password ******************** encrypted privilege 15
prompt hostname context 
Cryptochecksum:170961d3152823431bba5137e1295291
: end
]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc08293</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 May 2008 18:55:49 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[BitTorrent and ASA5510]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc07f60</link>
<description><![CDATA[I just installed an ASA5510.  Cisco is brand new to me, and I'm still struggling with writing rules for the thing.

I have some understanding, having worked previously with an old Livingston firewall.  Also read the O'Reilly Firewall book :)

I was looking at the firewall dashboard and it showed Bit Torrent taking up about 40% of the total traffic for the last hour.  The ASA5510 dashboard seems to have detected that on it's own, I don't have anything specific written to trap BT.

I'd like to know, is there information I can pull out of the thing?  Can I tell which of my internal hosts is generating this traffic without writing a specific trap to log?

And, is there a one-liner I can write under Configuration/Firewall, to block Bit Torrent?  It's against a company policy here to be using it anyway.

Fred
]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc07f60</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 May 2008 13:14:29 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[site being blocked]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc07663</link>
<description><![CDATA[We just replaced our obsolete 515 with an ASA5510 and find that one of the sites that was available before is no longer available, switching them back brings the site access back.

So, our new configuration is not allowing one particular site and I'm trying to identify why it is blocked.

The site - &lt;A HREF=&quot;javascript:newWin('http://www.ci.detroit.mi.us')&quot;&gt;www.ci.detroit.mi.us&lt;/A&gt;

Thanks for all comments]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc07663</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 May 2008 11:14:58 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[ASA 5520 with SSM]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc07571</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi all,

I have ASA 5520 with CSC-SSM modul. And, i am intrested in, What IP address and Gateway have i to assign to SSM module. I know, IP which will be assign SSM module have to reach internet for Trend Micro for updates. I just need to assign inside interface any IP address and gateway ??? Need UR advice :)))

tnx in advance]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc07571</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 May 2008 10:58:34 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[ASA upgrade to version 8 of code not working]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc07d84</link>
<description><![CDATA[We are in the process of upgrading our IOS on the ASA to version 8 of code but when we upgrade and migrate over our current running config all traffic is able to go out but not come in. We havent opened a ticket with Cisco yet but I would like to hear if anyone has any recomendations]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc07d84</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 May 2008 10:56:00 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[DNS question on ASA5505]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc07e57</link>
<description><![CDATA[Is it possible using a ASA5505 to sort of...augment the DNS resolution?

We are using DHCP to configure inside hosts and they are being given the ISP's DNS server info but we have one internal server we would like them to be able to resolve as well.

So like hello.world.com maybe doesnt exist, but i would like it to resolve internally to 10.10.10.10.

Is this possible?
]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc07e57</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 May 2008 10:32:28 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[allow some users can access IM]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc068b4</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi,

I enable the fw and it can block all IM (yahoo and MSN). However, I would like to enable some customers (192.168.25.12 and 192.168.25.13) can use  MSN and yahoo IM. How do I config the csico 1811?


### config
:
:
appfw policy-name test
  application im aol
    server deny name oam-d09a.blue.aol.com
    audit-trail on
  application im msn
    service default action reset alarm
    service text-chat action reset alarm
application http
    port-misuse im action reset alarm
  application im yahoo
    service default action reset alarm
    service text-chat action reset alarm
    server deny name scs.msg.yahoo.com
:
:
:
interface Vlan1
 ip inspect test in

]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc068b4</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 May 2008 09:34:22 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[ASA Active/Standby ASDM Configuration Problem]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc07d37</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi,

I am trying to configure Active/Standby LAN-based stateful failover on two ASA 5510 running OS version 7.2(3)and having Security Plus license.

I assigned IP addresses to the interfaces as shown in the attachement and I could ping all interfaces. The interfaces are connected using cross-over cables.
When I started High Availability Wizard in ASDM to configure Failover, I get the error message &quot; One or more of the peer connectivity or cpmpatibility test failed. You must resolve the problems before you can proceed further.&quot;

Also, I tried configuring failover using the CLI according to the document at &lt;A HREF=&quot;javascript:newWin('http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa72/configuration/guide/failover.html#wpmkr1133737')&quot;&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa72/configuration/guide/failover.html#wpmkr1133737&lt;/A&gt;.
When I got to step 4b under LAN based failover, I get the error message:
Primary-ASA(config)# failover interface ip failover 192.168.200.1 255.255.255.252 standby 192.168.200.2

Interface failover is not a failover or stateful interface.

Any ideas on what I am doing wrong? Any problems with licensing on these ASAs?

Thanks for your help.

&lt;b&gt;Attachment Keywords : &lt;/b&gt; 
1) Failover Config Error Capture.JPG
2) Failover Config Error_001.txt
]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc07d37</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 May 2008 08:53:14 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[SNMP counter 32 or counter 64]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc07d95</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi

I would like to know how would I go about finding out whether the Cisco Firewall Services Module Version 3.1(6) for snmp/mib is either 32 or 64? is there a show command to view this?

I have a problem pulling stats using my NMS and feel that the wrap is too quick for my poll.

Thanks in advanced.

Regards,]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc07d95</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 May 2008 06:13:29 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Version 8.3 ]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc07d90</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi, We have multiple ASA's (7.2) and installed on different locations and we have established VPN connection among all of them. Now we want to upgrade 8.3 version one by one on all location. After upgrading it is required new configuration or all configuration will be remaining same and can VPN tuneel support between installed asa 5505 both have different versions (7.2 and 8.3). Please tell us the advantage of version 8.3 as well. Thanks..]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc07d90</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 May 2008 06:10:13 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[ASA ignoring gratuitous ARP]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc07d3e</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi there, I have a pair of F5 Firepass SSL VPN devices. They are sitting behind a pair of ASA's. When the Firepass devices fail over they send a gratuitous ARP informing of the MAC change but the ASA ignores this. The only way I can resolve it is to cleat the ARP on the Firewalls. I searched existing posts here and found a similar topic but not much repsonse. Has anybody seen this before? 

Any help appreciated. 

Mark]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc07d3e</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 May 2008 04:25:48 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[configuration of firewall in unique way]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc07d2b</link>
<description><![CDATA[I have a firewall ASA-5510 ver 7.0 with 3 interfaces, one is connected to my internal LAN, one interface is connected to ISPs with public IP 203.27.53.112 and last is going to a router which is connected to another ISP with public IP 57.12.26.53. I am using a summarized address of 192.168.0.0/16 . my requirement is that I have 2 subnet 192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.2.0/24. I want to send my 192.168.1.0/24 internet traffic via 203.27.53.112 and 192.168.2.0/24 via 57.12.26.53(via router).Is it possible, if yes, please guide me through.

regards
Ravi]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc07d2b</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 May 2008 04:07:43 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Two ASA Firewalls - only one works]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc01b7e</link>
<description><![CDATA[We have two ASA 5510 devices.  Both configured exactly the same.  One is working, the other isn't.  We plug ASA (2) in to the network and unplug ASA (1) and we can ping internally, and to our DMZ, but we can't browse to the web.  We go back to ASA (1) and all is fine.  
Any suggestions?  NB: We are not using anything as fancy as Failover - just manually unplugging one and plugging the other one in.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc01b7e</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 May 2008 03:08:01 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[PIX525 and IE]]></title>
<link>http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;type=rss&amp;forum=Security&amp;topic=Firewalling&amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc07cd2</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi all,
How can i make PIX525 working through IE, Which program that should be added to PIX525 that make it working through IE?

best regards
thaar]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">.2cc07cd2</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 May 2008 01:53:00 PST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
