getXML('<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><ActiveMessages>Unified Communications Applications14206<Community id=".ee6b2b0" title="Networking Professionals">  <Forum id=".ee6c827" title="Unified Communications and Video"><Topic id=".ee835d2" private="" title="Unified Communications Applications"><Conversation id=".2cd4f370" messages="0" subscribed="yes" title="CRA Agent hears busy signal on all CSQ"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" editable="yes" id=".2cd4f370" level="">            <Author authinfo=" UQAM">massam.armel</Author><Timestamp>Nov 17, 2009, 8:51am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Platform:&lt;br /&gt;Call Manager 4.1(3)sr7&lt;br /&gt;CRA 3.5 with JTAPI 2.1(3.28)Release&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sometime, a CRA agent phone called hears a busy signal when taking the call.&lt;br /&gt;So agent loss call and has to wait next call. We don&apos;t know if the caller party is dropped or is kept on waiting queue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In attachment IVRLogs,respectivily, check Agent with ID 5062 at Nov 17th 10:38 and agent ID 5063 at 11:01.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Attachment Keywords : &lt;/b&gt; &lt;br /&gt;1) CRA Administration-5062.txt&lt;br /&gt;2) CRA Administration-5063.txt&lt;br /&gt;</Msgbody> <Attachment><Document><FileName>CRA Administration-5062.txt</FileName><DocID>123681</DocID><ContentType>text/plain</ContentType><InternalType>text</InternalType><Size>1861748</Size><ExpirationDate>11/17/2014</ExpirationDate><IsExpired>no</IsExpired></Document><Document><FileName>CRA Administration-5063.txt</FileName><DocID>123692</DocID><ContentType>text/plain</ContentType><InternalType>text</InternalType><Size>3090076</Size><ExpirationDate>11/17/2014</ExpirationDate><IsExpired>no</IsExpired></Document></Attachment></Message></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd4f1f3" messages="6" subscribed="no" title="External Access to Voicemail"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4f1f3" level="">            <Author authinfo=" VISTA DATA SYSTEMS">LittleGino</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 2:50pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Can someone explain the process the end users executes to access their own voicemails when outside of the office?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thank you, Paul</Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message><Replies><MessagesSelected>30</MessagesSelected><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4f1f3/0" level="1." new="yes">      <Author authinfo="ENGINEER.CUSTOMER SUPPORT, Cisco Systems, Inc.">bmagnani</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 2:52pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Paul,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A common way this is done is give users a # that hits something like a CTI route point that is always set to CFA to Unity, they&apos;ll be presented with the ability to enter their ID and PIN and login.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hope that helps,&lt;br /&gt;Brad</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4f1f3/4" level="1.1" new="yes">            <Author authinfo=" VISTA DATA SYSTEMS">LittleGino</Author><Timestamp>Nov 17, 2009, 8:05am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>bmagnani, can you show me an example of the command to do this?  Thank you, Paul</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message></Reply></Reply><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4f1f3/1" level="2." new="yes"><Author authinfo=" KINGDOM NETWORK SERVICES LLC">kingdomnetsvc</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 3:56pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>If they have a DID number, where they can call their phone, or actually nay phone that will go to a unity mailbox, they can hit * while the greeting is playing, and they will be prompted to enter their extension and pin. They will then be able to access their messages. This is assuming a pretty standard configuration of Unity.</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4f1f3/2" level="2.1" new="yes">      <Author authinfo="Lead IPT Consultant, MINX TECHNOLOGY SERVICES LTD" ccie="yes">jamesha</Author><Timestamp>Nov 17, 2009, 7:24am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>To make things simpler for users you can set their cellphone number as an alternate extension. Unity will then recognise the caller and prompt them for their PIN before giving access.&lt;br /&gt;If you do not do this then when Unity answers the user has to press * then enter their extension and PIN.</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4f1f3/3" level="2.1.1" new="yes">            <Author authinfo=" VISTA DATA SYSTEMS">LittleGino</Author><Timestamp>Nov 17, 2009, 8:03am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Jamesha, thank you.  can you show me an example of the commands to set the cell phone number?  Paul </Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4f1f3/5" level="2.1.1.1" new="yes">            <Author authinfo=" safety insurance">safety2008</Author><Timestamp>Nov 17, 2009, 8:26am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>all good ways, we do it as Brad states with a did, did is set up in cm and in unity under call routing.forwarded calls&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;7557 is the did.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Attachment Keywords : &lt;/b&gt; &lt;br /&gt;1) uunitydid.PNG&lt;br /&gt;</Msgbody><Attachment><Document><FileName>uunitydid.PNG</FileName><DocID>123680</DocID><ContentType>image/x-png</ContentType><InternalType>image</InternalType><Size>57622</Size><ExpirationDate>11/17/2014</ExpirationDate><IsExpired>no</IsExpired></Document></Attachment></Message></Reply></Reply></Reply></Reply></Replies></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd4e93f" messages="5" subscribed="no" title="User Import in Unity 7.0"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4e93f" level="">      <Author authinfo="SYSTEMTECHNIKER, DEUTSCHE TELEKOM">astrohmeier</Author><Timestamp>Nov 10, 2009, 11:54pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Hello,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I installed Unity 7.0 at a customer as UMS Integration in Active Directory. &lt;br /&gt;If I want to import users with the Bulk import tool I get the error message that Display_Name is not an allowed header.&lt;br /&gt;I installed Unity so that it is not allowed for Unity to create Users in AD. I got the error.log in german does this help you?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;kind regards Achim</Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message><Replies><MessagesSelected>30</MessagesSelected><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4e93f/0" level="1." new="yes">            <Author authinfo=" DILLON IP COMMUNICATION SERVICES LLC">gkavan</Author><Timestamp>Nov 13, 2009, 11:09pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Hi -&lt;br /&gt;Do you need to code this in your input file?  It is an optional field, from Cisco&apos;s administration guide information:&lt;br /&gt;"Specifies the display name for the subscriber. The format selected here should be consistent with the Exchange name generation rule for existing Exchange mailboxes.&lt;br /&gt;When no display name is specified, it is constructed in one of the following ways, as applicable:&lt;br /&gt;•The first and last names as specified in the message store."  Since you are creating the user in AD and mail-enabling before import into Unity sounds like it will take the information from the existing mail account.&lt;br /&gt;•"The first and last names as specified in the rule in the subscriber template that is selected during the import."  This sounds like another option for you to try, leave it blank in the csv file, but designate how you want it in the Subscriber template to be used during the import.&lt;br /&gt;"Enter any combination of letters, digits, spaces, periods, commas, apostrophes, or other characters—including dashes, up to a maximum of 64 characters."&lt;br /&gt;I only have experience with English version so I don&apos;t know if that could be part of the problem you are seeing, but hope it may help somewhat.&lt;br /&gt;Sincerely,&lt;br /&gt;Ginger</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4e93f/1" level="1.1" new="yes">      <Author authinfo="SYSTEMTECHNIKER, DEUTSCHE TELEKOM">astrohmeier</Author><Timestamp>Nov 15, 2009, 10:45pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Hi,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I don´t want to use the csy file. I wanted to import the users direct from AD. When I do this I received the error message.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Achim</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4e93f/2" level="1.1.1" new="yes">            <Author authinfo=" NEXUS IS, INC">tcatlinins</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 9:01am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Do a quick test.  IF you cant import from the SA webpage of Unity, then you have a bigger problem, probably permissions.</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4e93f/3" level="1.1.1.1" new="yes">      <Author authinfo="SYSTEMTECHNIKER, DEUTSCHE TELEKOM">astrohmeier</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 10:01pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Hi,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;from the SA web page I can import users. But the customer have about 800 users and I don´t want to import them one after another.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Achim</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4e93f/4" level="1.1.1.1.1" new="yes">            <Author authinfo=" NEXUS IS, INC">tcatlinins</Author><Timestamp>Nov 17, 2009, 7:01am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Since you are importing from AD, you should not need the display name.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please see table 15-1&lt;br /&gt;&lt;A HREF="javascript:newWin(&apos;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/unity/402/administration/guide/ex/SAG_0160.html&apos;)"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/unity/402/administration/guide/ex/SAG_0160.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;LAST_NAME&lt;br /&gt;FIRST_NAME &lt;br /&gt;DTMF_ACCESS_ID&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;AD will populate the display name.</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message></Reply></Reply></Reply></Reply></Reply></Replies></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd4ef8c" messages="2" subscribed="no" title="SIP trunk or H323 to CUBE from CUCM"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4ef8c" level="">            <Author authinfo=" PROMEDIA TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC">steigja</Author><Timestamp>Nov 14, 2009, 5:50pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Hello All,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;     What are the advantages or disadvantages of either setting up a SIP trunk to a CUBE or using H323?  I also will have an ASA between the CUCM an the CUBE, what are the specific port numbers I will have to allow through for either protocol?  thanks&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Jason</Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message><Replies><MessagesSelected>30</MessagesSelected><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4ef8c/0" level="1." new="yes"><Author authinfo=" CISCO SYSTEMS">virverma</Author><Timestamp>Nov 15, 2009, 11:41pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>check h323 and SIP trunk in this link,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;A HREF="javascript:newWin(&apos;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps5640/products_configuration_example09186a00808ead0f.shtml&apos;)"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps5640/products_configuration_example09186a00808ead0f.shtml&lt;/A&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;hope it helps!</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message></Reply><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4ef8c/1" level="2." new="yes">            <Author authinfo=" SMITH &amp; NEPHEW">shell99102</Author><Timestamp>Nov 17, 2009, 6:49am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Sorry misread the post.</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message></Reply></Replies></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd4f2d8" messages="2" subscribed="no" title="CME - Presence/IM Client"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4f2d8" level="">      <Author authinfo=", COMPUTER CENTERLINE OF GREENSBURG">b.gamble</Author><Timestamp>Nov 17, 2009, 4:57am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>CME allows limited Presence features. Are there any options for messaging clients? CUPC requires a full Presence box. I was hoping there&apos;d be at least a limited or lightweight client for use with CME. </Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message><Replies><MessagesSelected>30</MessagesSelected><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4f2d8/0" level="1." new="yes">      <Author authinfo="Systems Engineer, PARAGON DEVELOPMENT SYSTEMS INC">j.schulenberg</Author><Timestamp>Nov 17, 2009, 6:40am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>The product is called Cisco Unified Call Connector.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;A HREF="javascript:newWin(&apos;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/ps6789/ps7046/ps7274/ps7067/product_data_sheet0900aecd8053c8ad.html&apos;)"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/ps6789/ps7046/ps7274/ps7067/product_data_sheet0900aecd8053c8ad.html&lt;/A&gt;</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4f2d8/1" level="1.1" new="yes">      <Author authinfo=", COMPUTER CENTERLINE OF GREENSBURG">b.gamble</Author><Timestamp>Nov 17, 2009, 6:45am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Dynamite. That looks like just what I need.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks.</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message></Reply></Reply></Replies></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd4f308" messages="0" subscribed="no" title="Fax Concerns - CUCM 7.0 to CUBE through ASA, H.323"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4f308" level="">            <Author authinfo=" PROMEDIA TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC">steigja</Author><Timestamp>Nov 17, 2009, 6:15am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Hello All,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;      I&apos;am looking for some advice on faxing.  The network will consists of two CUCM 7.0 servers with a CUBE gateway sitting behind an ASA.  There is no ATA&apos;s being used, everything will be pots with use of VG224&apos;s.  Currently I have all internet calls using G.711 and all calls to the CUBE will be G.729.  What fax method can I use?  Can I use fax-relay?  Thanks&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Jason</Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd4eabd" messages="3" subscribed="no" title="Unity Connection Ldap Sync"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4eabd" level="">            <Author authinfo=" PRESIDIO NETWORKED SOLUTIONS INC" ccie="yes">aalejo</Author><Timestamp>Nov 11, 2009, 2:47pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>It is posible that every time that a Unity Connection performed a full sync it also sync the extension from the corporate AD extension number?&lt;br /&gt;Righ now, it is only performing the extension sync when the user is imported (first time).&lt;br /&gt;The idea is to manage everything from the AD.&lt;br /&gt;Any workarounds?</Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message><Replies><MessagesSelected>30</MessagesSelected><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4eabd/0" level="1." new="yes">      <Author authinfo="ENGINEER.CUSTOMER SUPPORT, Cisco Systems, Inc.">bmagnani</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 8:11pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Alejandro,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;A HREF="javascript:newWin(&apos;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/7x/user_mac/guide/7xcucmac105.html#Integrating_Existing_Cisco_Unity_Connection_User_Accounts_with_LDAP_User_Accounts&apos;)"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/7x/user_mac/guide/7xcucmac105.html#Integrating_Existing_Cisco_Unity_Connection_User_Accounts_with_LDAP_User_Accounts&lt;/A&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It states:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you have configured Connection to periodically resynchronize Connection data with LDAP data, new values in the LDAP directory are automatically imported into the Connection database during the next automatic resynchronization. However, if new users have been added to the LDAP directory, this resynchronization does not create new Connection users. You must manually create new Connection users by using either the Import Users tool or the Bulk Administration Tool.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So, to answer your question, yes, the documentation implies that the extension should get updated after a synchronization cycle completes&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hope that helps,&lt;br /&gt;Brad</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4eabd/1" level="1.1" new="yes">            <Author authinfo=" PRESIDIO NETWORKED SOLUTIONS INC" ccie="yes">aalejo</Author><Timestamp>Nov 17, 2009, 4:52am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Hi Brad&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Documentation implies that but it DOES NOT work. Extension number are sync ONLY the first time (when the user is imported).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4eabd/2" level="1.1.1" new="yes">      <Author authinfo=", COMPUTER CENTERLINE OF GREENSBURG">b.gamble</Author><Timestamp>Nov 17, 2009, 5:13am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>I just tested this. It works, but it doesn&apos;t synch the extension. It synchs the Corporate Phone Number lower on the page.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I tested by changing both the Telephone Number on the "General" tab under the user&apos;s AD properties, and the IP Phone number on the "Telephones" tab. The only one that changed anything after synching in Connex was the Telephone Number on the "General Tab." It modifies the corporate number near the bottom of the user&apos;s page in question. The extension wasn&apos;t modified.</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message></Reply></Reply></Reply></Replies></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd4f2c8" messages="0" subscribed="no" title="Full Unified Solution required"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4f2c8" level="">            <Author authinfo=" EADS">Lee_Barrell</Author><Timestamp>Nov 17, 2009, 4:16am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Hi All&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I’ve been tasked with the job of putting together a demonstration suite for a Cisco unified solution. We have a number of items in place already and I need to add to this list so we can demonstrate a fully featured up-to-date unified Voice and Video solution from our Corporate headquarters.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So far I&apos;ve been involved with setting up the following on our demo network.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Multi node/router network with a number of POE switches in different demonstration locations around the building, physical servers, a large VMware ESX platform, Exchange and AD, BES 5 (Blackberry Enterprise Server). I also have the following Cisco services running on our network as follows:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;•	CallManager version v7, clustered 2 x Hardware Servers&lt;br /&gt;•	CallManager Express (v8 beta, testing IPV:6)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At present I’ve configured the following; extension mobility, MLPP, Class of Service, Barge and Privacy, MGCP, and external routeing via UKNP using a BRI gateway. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I would like to add the following features to the network;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;•	Presence (using Cisco Unified Personal communicator)&lt;br /&gt;•	Video conferencing &lt;br /&gt;•	Voice messaging&lt;br /&gt;•	Meeting Place&lt;br /&gt;•	Mobile communicator (Blackberry integration)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So I’ve proposed the following upgrades to our network and would really appreciate some pointers on the Hardware software I will need. Also I’m not 100% sure what products are available through CEO download as a demo and also what services require specific hardware and a licence? I would like to run as many of the applications as possible on our VMware network!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Proposed upgrade:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;•	Cisco Unity Unified Messaging&lt;br /&gt;•	CUPS: Cisco Unified Presence Server&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;•	Cisco Unified Meeting Place: integrated voice, video, and web collaboration&lt;br /&gt;•	Cisco Unified Video Conferencing&lt;br /&gt;o	Cisco Unified Video Desktop&lt;br /&gt;•	Cisco Unified Personal Communicator&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;•	Cisco Unified Mobility Advantage Server&lt;br /&gt;o	Cisco Unified Mobile Communicator:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Any help would be much appreciated indeed!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Lee&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;</Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd4e9c9" messages="1" subscribed="no" title="Unity Auto Attendant fail over"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4e9c9" level=""><Author authinfo=" A T I SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL INC">gshamlian</Author><Timestamp>Nov 11, 2009, 6:16am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Hello All,&lt;br /&gt;First, I apologize if this is in the wrong place, but I have to start somewhere&lt;br /&gt;We are using Unity 4.0(5) utilizing Auto-Attendant and Call Handlers for our branches.  Lately, the Unity server has been failing (we are working on replacing it), so when callers try reaching the branches while Unity is down, the call handler does not pick up.  We were wondering if there was a way, if Unity is down, to have the call failover to another number rather than the one the call handler uses.  Thanks and if any other info is needed, please ask.</Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message><Replies><MessagesSelected>30</MessagesSelected><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4e9c9/0" level="1." new="yes">      <Author authinfo="ENGINEER.CUSTOMER SUPPORT, Cisco Systems, Inc.">bmagnani</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 8:18pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Gary,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You could try something in the phone system.  For example, if its CUCM, you could maybe put a phone device at the end of the line group which contains the voice mail ports.  That way, depending on how you have your line group hunt options setup, if the voice mail ports fail to answer (due to Unity being down) it&apos;ll hunt to that last phone which you could maybe configure to go to an Operator who will answer the phone.  Just an idea off the top of my head... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hope that helps,&lt;br /&gt;Brad</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message></Reply></Replies></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd4ef7d" messages="1" subscribed="no" title="Unity 4.0(5) Upgrade - Dialing Domain Digit Entry Problem"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4ef7d" level="">      <Author authinfo="Solutions Architect, BELL CANADA">kdunning</Author><Timestamp>Nov 14, 2009, 1:44pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>We upgraded to Unity 4.0(5) so that we can use the COBRAS tool.  Post-upgrade testing is good, with one anomaly.  When we try to enter the pilot point of other Unity servers in our servers dialing domain, we get an error that says:&lt;br /&gt;&apos;Invalid Character for dial string - Entry ignored.&lt;br /&gt;Legal characters are:  "0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9".&apos;&lt;br /&gt;We are entering the pilot point of the other servers and are definitely using numbers.  We have tried other screens and no issues entering information.  Anyone seen this before?</Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message><Replies><MessagesSelected>30</MessagesSelected><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4ef7d/0" level="1." new="yes">      <Author authinfo="ENGINEER.CUSTOMER SUPPORT, Cisco Systems, Inc.">bmagnani</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 7:59pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Keri,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sounds like there may possibly be leading whitespace?  Try hitting backspace and making sure that there&apos;s no leading space present.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If that doesn&apos;t yield any results, you can add the Dial String into the SQL manually if you still can&apos;t get SAWeb to accept input:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Open SQL Enterprise Manager&gt; Databases &gt; Unitydb &gt; Tables &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Click on LocationTransfer table&lt;br /&gt;Click on Action &gt; Open Table &gt; Return all rows&lt;br /&gt;Manually enter the Dial String&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hope that helps,&lt;br /&gt;Brad</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message></Reply></Replies></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd4f233" messages="1" subscribed="no" title="Unity Connection IMAP to Lotus Notes"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4f233" level=""><Author authinfo=" AT;T">ftsao49</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 7:33pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Does a single Unity Connection server have the capability to integrate to multiple Lotus Notes server via IMAP?  My customer has about 7 instances of Lotus Notes which contain separate users and mailboxes, but wishes to use a centralized Unity Connection server at HQ.</Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message><Replies><MessagesSelected>30</MessagesSelected><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4f233/0" level="1." new="yes">      <Author authinfo="ENGINEER.CUSTOMER SUPPORT, Cisco Systems, Inc.">bmagnani</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 7:38pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Freddie,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Unity Connection is its own mailstore, there is no external integration with Domino or Exchange mail stores.  You can have users access Unity Connection via IMAP clients (Lotus Notes), yes but messages are all stored on the UC server.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;See the compatibility matrix for software on user workstations:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;A HREF="javascript:newWin(&apos;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/compatibility/matrix/cucclientmtx.html#wp57584&apos;)"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/compatibility/matrix/cucclientmtx.html#wp57584&lt;/A&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hope that helps,&lt;br /&gt;Brad</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message></Reply></Replies></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd4eee7" messages="1" subscribed="no" title="Unity &amp; Firewall Issue (firewall drops idle connection)"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4eee7" level="">      <Author authinfo="Technical Consultant, TELECOM NEW ZEALAND LTD">johncaston</Author><Timestamp>Nov 13, 2009, 1:33pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Hi All,&lt;br /&gt;We&apos;re in the process of implementing Unity  for a security conscious customer. There&apos;s a firewall sitting between the Unity and Exchange server. We have problems with the Notify module in that after 60 minutes the authentication appears to fail and notifications fail. We&apos;ve temporarily got around it by scheduling a restart of the AvNotifierMgr service every 55 minutes.&lt;br /&gt;It looks like the firewall is dropping the connection after 60 minutes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Does anyone know what the default "idle"time is on the Unity, or where this can be changed?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Has anyone seen this fault before and shed some light on a better solution than restarting services?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;many thanks,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;John</Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message><Replies><MessagesSelected>30</MessagesSelected><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4eee7/0" level="1." new="yes">      <Author authinfo="Sr. Network Engineer, EPL, INC.">ddddavidson</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 3:05pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>While it would not solve all of the problems, you could configure a timeout exception for the firewall (assuming it is an FWSM or ASA) to keep it from dropping the connection.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We had to do something similar for CUPS and the SIP transcations it uses.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;HTH,&lt;br /&gt;Doug</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message></Reply></Replies></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd4f1f6" messages="0" subscribed="no" title="Meeting Place Express Backups"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4f1f6" level="">      <Author authinfo="Sr. Network Engineer, EPL, INC.">ddddavidson</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 3:02pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Is there a way to limit the number of backups retained by Meeting Place Express?</Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd4f1e3" messages="0" subscribed="no" title="Backup CER server not regsitering"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4f1e3" level="">      <Author authinfo="Consultant, East West Partners">bocasierra</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 2:17pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Our Primary CER server is having a hardware issue. The backup server took over and registered with the Call Manager. We had to reboot the backup server and now it is not registering. Any ideas where to look? CER is 2.0 </Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd4f141" messages="2" subscribed="no" title="Unity virtualization and CPU Affinity"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4f141" level="">      <Author authinfo="Deployment Engineer, ENVENTIS TELECOM INC">nordendale</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 9:09am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>I have a customer that is interested in building a virtualized unity 7 configuration but is not happy about being required to run CPU affinity. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have read the following:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;A HREF="javascript:newWin(&apos;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/unity/virtualization_design/guide/cuvirtualdgx.html&apos;)"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/unity/virtualization_design/guide/cuvirtualdgx.html&lt;/A&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;and&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;A HREF="javascript:newWin(&apos;http://ciscoccvp.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/cisco-unity-virtualization/&apos;)"&gt;http://ciscoccvp.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/cisco-unity-virtualization/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;will it work if we don&apos;t use CPU Affinity? Has Cisco begun to work on other options? </Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message><Replies><MessagesSelected>30</MessagesSelected><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4f141/0" level="1." new="yes">      <Author authinfo="Systems Engineer, PARAGON DEVELOPMENT SYSTEMS INC">j.schulenberg</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 12:17pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Sure it will work, but not well and you will not be supported. Unity is processing *real time* voice traffic. It needs *real time* CPU access to avoid bad recordings or TUI experience.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There are other options in the works for other UC products but all of them will require resource dedication in one way or another. The customer needs to be educated that these are real-time applications. He/she cannot expect the same type of over subscription as they get with file servers.</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4f141/1" level="1.1" new="yes">      <Author authinfo="Deployment Engineer, ENVENTIS TELECOM INC">nordendale</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 12:23pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Thank you for your help!</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message></Reply></Reply></Replies></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd4f149" messages="1" subscribed="no" title="Multiple Hunt Group Log in"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4f149" level="">            <Author authinfo=" BT">steve.dyer</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 9:23am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Callmanger 6.1.3190.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have a scenario where a user wants to be able to log in/out of two different Hunt Groups.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have tried a test setup with a number making it a member of 2 Hunt Groups and assigning the Hlog softkey.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However when you log in /out it is both Hunt groups. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Is there any way of specifying which Hunt group you want to log in /out of ?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Steve&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message><Replies><MessagesSelected>30</MessagesSelected><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4f149/0" level="1." new="yes">      <Author authinfo="Systems Engineer, PARAGON DEVELOPMENT SYSTEMS INC">j.schulenberg</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 12:14pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Not in UCM. I believe you can pull it off with CME. Please specify which product and version you&apos;re using when posting.</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message></Reply></Replies></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd4f186" messages="0" subscribed="no" title="MPE, Wrong Request"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4f186" level="">            <Author authinfo=" INGRAM BARGE COMPANY">fultont</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 11:39am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Recently we have begun to receive the following error message from Meeting Place Express - "Sorry, MPE does not understand your request" after attempting a logon.  If we then click on Schedule, we are prompted with the input screen for scheduling a meeting.  If we we click on Log In, we can enter the login information a second time, it works fine.  Any idea on what is causing this and how to resolve?</Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd4f145" messages="0" subscribed="no" title="CUBAC - Moving Database Supported???"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4f145" level="">      <Author authinfo="Network Engineer, E-VELOCITY TECHNICAL CONSULTING LLC">dlcharville</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 9:14am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Hello,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Does anyone know if moving the database from the CUBAC server to a SQL server is supported?  My customer doesn&apos;t want the MS SQL Express installed on a separate server since they already have a SQL enterprise server.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CUBAC has the "Database Management" section to configure where the SQL server is sitting.  I can&apos;t really find anything in the docs saying it isn&apos;t supported.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Main reason for this question is that I am receiving the following error message when making configuration changes AFTER customer has already moved the database "Server error. Error Data : FAILURE : 15"&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Still need to dive into the logs but wanted to see if anybody knew the Cisco Supported on moving the database.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;Dan</Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd4d3e9" messages="12" subscribed="no" title="Cisco Unity"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4d3e9" level=""><Author authinfo=" BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST">brian.fleishman</Author><Timestamp>Oct 29, 2009, 5:31am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Receiving an error in Cisco Unity.&lt;br /&gt;"The Cisco Unity service that monitors Actiev Directory (AvDSAD) cannot modify the location object default in the domain (domain). This service must perform a full synchronization cycle with the domain controller (domain controller) before changes will be synchronized correctly. A full syncrhonization cycle will occure in approx 2 minutes."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We recently upgraded our domain controller to 2008. Is this a permission problem or is there somewhere I can go to perform a synchronization?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks for your help.</Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message><Replies><MessagesSelected>30</MessagesSelected><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4d3e9/0" level="1." new="yes">      <Author authinfo="ENGINEER.CUSTOMER SUPPORT, Cisco Systems, Inc.">bmagnani</Author><Timestamp>Oct 29, 2009, 5:33am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Brian,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The DC/GC Reconnect Settings tool in the Tools Depot under Administration Tools will allow you to perform a resync for both the DC and the GC.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hope that helps,&lt;br /&gt;Brad</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4d3e9/1" level="1.1" new="yes"><Author authinfo=" BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST">brian.fleishman</Author><Timestamp>Oct 29, 2009, 8:55am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Thanks for getting back to me Brad.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I was able to find that however it will still error out. Are there any compatibility problems with Server 2008 AD?</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4d3e9/2" level="1.1.1" new="yes">            <Author authinfo=" DILLON IP COMMUNICATION SERVICES LLC">gkavan</Author><Timestamp>Oct 29, 2009, 11:36am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Hi -&lt;br /&gt;What version of Unity are you running?  See this info - You must install Cisco Unity 7.0 Engineering Special 7 or later on the Cisco Unity server in the following instances:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;–When the Cisco Unity server is a member server in an Active Directory 2008 domain.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;–When Active Directory objects for Cisco Unity subscribers, contacts, distribution lists, or locations were created in an Active Directory 2008 domain.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Engineering specials are available at &lt;A HREF="javascript:newWin(&apos;http://tools.cisco.com/support/downloads/go/Redirect.x?mdfid=278875240&apos;)"&gt;http://tools.cisco.com/support/downloads/go/Redirect.x?mdfid=278875240&lt;/A&gt;. (From the Downloads page, expand Unified Communications Applications &gt; Voice Mail and Unified Messaging &gt; Cisco Unity, and click Cisco Unity Version 7.0 &gt; Unity System Software.) - See the ES21 Rollup in the Downloads for Unity 7 - included in there.&lt;br /&gt;I believe there is also one for Unity version 5.X.&lt;br /&gt;Ginger</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4d3e9/3" level="1.1.1.1" new="yes">      <Author authinfo="Manager, IT, Science World">jrandall2</Author><Timestamp>Nov 10, 2009, 12:15pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>I am also getting this problem.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have ES21 applied, and have re-run the permission wizard and granted permissions to the root of the domain.  I still get this issue.</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4d3e9/4" level="1.1.1.1.1" new="yes">            <Author authinfo=" DILLON IP COMMUNICATION SERVICES LLC">gkavan</Author><Timestamp>Nov 10, 2009, 2:45pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Hi -&lt;br /&gt;Attaching this link to help clarify the Location Object - &lt;A HREF="javascript:newWin(&apos;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/unity/white/paper/5xcudatadirectory.html#wp39884&apos;)"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/unity/white/paper/5xcudatadirectory.html#wp39884&lt;/A&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When Unity is installed, there is an OU created in AD called Unity that contains the server&apos;s location.  Make sure your permissions wizard running at the root includes this OU.  Also, group policies can be applied at OUs which can explicitly deny permission down the chain.  You might check that OU with your domain admins.  There is an executable you can run logged onto the Unity server from command line called gpresult.  You can log onto the server using the unitydirsvc account for this command, which will tell you what domain level policies have been applied (the default is to show both user and computer policies).&lt;br /&gt;Ginger</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4d3e9/7" level="1.1.1.1.1.1" new="yes">      <Author authinfo="Manager, IT, Science World">jrandall2</Author><Timestamp>Nov 10, 2009, 3:07pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>I have run the permissions wizard and granted it to the unity, unity/locations and / contexts.&lt;br /&gt;I have run gpresults and found the policies in effect.  I have review the settings applied to the machine and have not noticed a setting in group policy that would prevent inheritance of permissions of a ou object.</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message></Reply></Reply></Reply></Reply></Reply></Reply><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4d3e9/5" level="2." new="yes">            <Author authinfo=" CISCO SYSTEMS">rmai</Author><Timestamp>Nov 10, 2009, 3:01pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Make sure that you run the AD 2008 XML Test since it&apos;s AD2008.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Check the CCO for the download.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It should be in the  ES21 Rollup in the Downloads for Unity 7.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4d3e9/6" level="2.1" new="yes">      <Author authinfo="Manager, IT, Science World">jrandall2</Author><Timestamp>Nov 10, 2009, 3:02pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Yes, I ran the test and didn&apos;t notice any negative results.</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4d3e9/8" level="2.1.1" new="yes"><Author authinfo=" BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST">brian.fleishman</Author><Timestamp>Nov 11, 2009, 5:58am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>You are still getting the error? I was able to resolve my problem by going to another 2003 DC, instead of the 2007. What exactly do you have for your permissions?</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4d3e9/9" level="2.1.1.1" new="yes">      <Author authinfo="Manager, IT, Science World">jrandall2</Author><Timestamp>Nov 11, 2009, 9:17am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Yes I am still getting the error.&lt;br /&gt;The unity permission wizard runs without issue.  it grants all the accounts the correct permissions. doing a spot check in the domain I see the unity directory service account has full permissions to the unity/locations objects...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I dont have any remaining 2003 dcs.  and using a 2003 dc isn&apos;t really a solution, that&apos;s rolling back.</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4d3e9/10" level="2.1.1.1.1" new="yes"><Author authinfo=" BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST">brian.fleishman</Author><Timestamp>Nov 11, 2009, 9:28am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>What errors are you getting in event viewer? Check your DCGC reconnect settings tools. Verify the Domain Controller and the Global Catalog server. You can also check the DohPropTest.exe stored on the commserver\\tech tools\\. Check the AD monitor so make sure the correct. Verify the DC server is set and try a totalresync, after a total resync, restart the services and try the permissions wizzard again.</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message></Reply></Reply></Reply></Reply></Reply><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4d3e9/11" level="3." new="yes">      <Author authinfo="Manager, IT, Science World">jrandall2</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 8:43am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Event Type:	Error&lt;br /&gt;Event Source:	CiscoUnity_DSAD&lt;br /&gt;Event Category:	Error &lt;br /&gt;Event ID:	1073&lt;br /&gt;Date:		11/16/2009&lt;br /&gt;Time:		8:41:10 AM&lt;br /&gt;User:		N/A&lt;br /&gt;Computer:	UNITY&lt;br /&gt;Description:&lt;br /&gt;The Cisco Unity service that monitors Active Directory (AvDSAD) cannot modify the location object default in the domain vieuxcarre.local. This service must perform a full synchronization cycle with the domain controller amanda.vieuxcarre.local before changes will be synchronized correctly. A full synchronization cycle will occur in approximately 2 minute(s). &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;I&apos;ve done all the dc and gc checks and total resyncs.  Nothing helps so far.</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message></Reply></Replies></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd4f0c1" messages="2" subscribed="no" title="CUPS 7.0.4 - Outlook Gateway"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4f0c1" level="">      <Author authinfo="Network Engineer, CARILLION IT SERVICES LTD">btmulgrew</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 5:09am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Hi - We are configuring CUPS 7.0.4 Outlook Gateway, however, our initial config had the incorrect certificate cn, we are now trying to use the new certificate which we have uploaded but I cannot see an option in the gateway config to use a different certificate?  I have tried deleting the current gateway but when re-entering the details it seems to remember the previous config and certificate details. Has anyone managed to do this before?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I will try restarting the presence engine after deleting the gateway out of hours tonight, but any help appreciated.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;thks</Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message><Replies><MessagesSelected>30</MessagesSelected><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4f0c1/0" level="1." new="yes"><Author authinfo=" Cisco Systems" ccie="yes">htluo</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 7:44am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>If the new cert is from the same CA, you don&apos;t have to anything.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;CUPS trust the CA, not the end-entity cert.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Michael&lt;br /&gt;&lt;A HREF="javascript:newWin(&apos;http://htluo.blogspot.com&apos;)"&gt;http://htluo.blogspot.com&lt;/A&gt;</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4f0c1/1" level="1.1" new="yes">      <Author authinfo="Network Engineer, CARILLION IT SERVICES LTD">btmulgrew</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 7:51am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Thanks Michael - so, even though the OWA server is effectively the CA (self signed) - when the new cert is uploaded to the OWA CUPS should see it?  Its just the current "root" certificate on CUPS has a CN of hostname rather than IP, but we have asked the customer to re-run makecert for the OWA IP to be present as the CN value on the new cert (we are not using DNS on CUPS).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also - well done on a great book!</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message></Reply></Reply></Replies></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd4e961" messages="8" subscribed="no" title="CUPC status issue"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4e961" level=""><Author authinfo=" iVision">panjwani80</Author><Timestamp>Nov 11, 2009, 2:02am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>CUPC is working except the phone presence. When i go off hook on the phone the status doesn&apos;t change to "on the phone" and remains at "Available" status. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have rebooted CUPS server twice and restarted CTI manager on UCM but still no good&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;CUPS version: 6.0.2&lt;br /&gt;UCM version: 6.1.3&lt;br /&gt;CUPC: 7.0.2&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;in system --&gt; troubleshooter everything is green except "SIP Publish Model" complaining about port mismatch on CUPS trunk from UCM, but nothing has changed and port is set to 5060 by default on CUPS trunk&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Any help would be much appreciated</Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message><Replies><MessagesSelected>30</MessagesSelected><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4e961/0" level="1." new="yes">            <Author authinfo=" IT College / CTT Argentina">cgm</Author><Timestamp>Nov 11, 2009, 5:30am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>I think that CUPS v6 needs 5070 as SIP destination port on the UCM SIP trunk.</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4e961/1" level="1.1" new="yes">      <Author authinfo=", DIMENSION DATA ITALIA">m.cucchi</Author><Timestamp>Nov 13, 2009, 1:05am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>hi all,&lt;br /&gt;i have the same problem, how is possible to solve it ?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;the message in Cups is following ....&lt;br /&gt;Verify SIP Publish Model  - Failed to verify host connectivity. Please check if using DNS SRV for host presentity.pri &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Help please</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message></Reply></Reply><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4e961/2" level="2." new="yes"><Author authinfo=" ABC">rupam_chakra1983</Author><Timestamp>Nov 13, 2009, 2:40am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>what is the phone model number which u are integrating with the CUPC</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4e961/3" level="2.1" new="yes">      <Author authinfo=", DIMENSION DATA ITALIA">m.cucchi</Author><Timestamp>Nov 13, 2009, 2:55am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>The model is 7960, but the stange things is that the status of publish the this phone send to CUPS is alway in "open" and no change notification is performed. But this behaviour is cheanged in the last 3 day apparently without make any change. </Msgbody><Attachment/></Message></Reply><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4e961/4" level="2.2" new="yes"><Author authinfo=" iVision">panjwani80</Author><Timestamp>Nov 13, 2009, 3:17am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>7941</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4e961/5" level="2.2.1" new="yes">      <Author authinfo=", DIMENSION DATA ITALIA">m.cucchi</Author><Timestamp>Nov 13, 2009, 3:20am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>I have also 7961, but the problem is the same.</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4e961/6" level="2.2.1.1" new="yes"><Author authinfo=" ABC">rupam_chakra1983</Author><Timestamp>Nov 15, 2009, 11:49pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>I have a doubt whether 7941 will send its staus to CUPS or not as i have seen the problem in 7940.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks&lt;br /&gt;Rupam</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4e961/7" level="2.2.1.1.1" new="yes"><Author authinfo=" Cisco Systems" ccie="yes">htluo</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 7:49am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>The status is NOT sent by the phone to the CUPS.  It&apos;s CUCM sends the PUBLISH message to CUPS.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Make sure you have the line appearance associated to end user.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Michael&lt;br /&gt;&lt;A HREF="javascript:newWin(&apos;http://htluo.blogspot.com&apos;)"&gt;http://htluo.blogspot.com&lt;/A&gt;</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message></Reply></Reply></Reply></Reply></Reply></Replies></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd4d8de" messages="5" subscribed="no" title="Application dial rule problem"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4d8de" level=""><Author authinfo=" VEM SISTEMI S.p.a.">bagnolini</Author><Timestamp>Nov 2, 2009, 12:52am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>I&apos;ve configured the integration with Sametimes and Cucm 7. Everything works correctly, for example I can call with sametimes, but I&apos;m not able to add/remove digit in the number to call.&lt;br /&gt;I&apos;ve configured the application dial rule, but it seems the call doesn&apos;t match that rule.&lt;br /&gt;This is my application-dial-rule:&lt;br /&gt;Number Begins With:0&lt;br /&gt;Number of Digits:10 &lt;br /&gt;Total Digits to be Removed:0&lt;br /&gt;Prefix With Pattern 0</Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message><Replies><MessagesSelected>30</MessagesSelected><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4d8de/0" level="1." new="yes">      <Author authinfo="Sen. System Konsulent, Atea AS / TRONDHEIM">runmosta</Author><Timestamp>Nov 2, 2009, 2:30am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>This is my rule for Norway&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Number begins with :&lt;br /&gt;Number og digist :8&lt;br /&gt;Total Digist to be Removed :0&lt;br /&gt;Prefix with:0&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It simply add a 0 for ekst. line.  We have 8 digist in Norway&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hope this helps</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4d8de/1" level="1.1" new="yes"><Author authinfo=" VEM SISTEMI S.p.a.">bagnolini</Author><Timestamp>Nov 2, 2009, 2:35am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Ok, but the problem is that when I make a call the system doesn&apos;t add the 0.&lt;br /&gt;I tried to call a number with 10 digit that starts with 0 (for example 0123456789) but the system call 0123456789 and not 00123456789&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4d8de/2" level="1.1.1" new="yes">      <Author authinfo="SE, ECONIS AG">auer.lukas</Author><Timestamp>Nov 13, 2009, 6:49am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Hi,&lt;br /&gt;same problem here. I even have the exact same application dial rule. Have you found a solution to this problem yet?&lt;br /&gt;lukas.</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4d8de/3" level="1.1.1.1" new="yes"><Author authinfo=" VEM SISTEMI S.p.a.">bagnolini</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 12:01am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Hi,&lt;br /&gt;for resolve the trouble read this document:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;A HREF="javascript:newWin(&apos;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucibmlotus/cpcap/7x/english/integration/guide/cpcapig.html&apos;)"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucibmlotus/cpcap/7x/english/integration/guide/cpcapig.html&lt;/A&gt;</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message></Reply></Reply></Reply></Reply><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4d8de/4" level="2." new="yes"><Author authinfo=" Cisco Systems" ccie="yes">htluo</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 7:47am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Do you have a CUPS server in the integration?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If yes, run the following command on the CUPS:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;run sql select * from applicationdialrule&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Copy/paste the screen output here.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks!&lt;br /&gt;Michael&lt;br /&gt;&lt;A HREF="javascript:newWin(&apos;http://htluo.blogspot.com&apos;)"&gt;http://htluo.blogspot.com&lt;/A&gt;</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message></Reply></Replies></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd4e852" messages="1" subscribed="no" title="Running Unity DAD tool"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4e852" level="">      <Author authinfo="Senior Project Engineer, VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.">ahopkins</Author><Timestamp>Nov 10, 2009, 11:01am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>After importing a user into Unity 7.02 if I change the subscribers extension, the subscriber account changes from a full subscriber account with voicemail to a internet subscriber account without voice mail.  I logged onto the Unity server using the Unitydirsvc account and ran the DAD tool on the account I imported.  Not all of the properties show that they have read/write access. My question is do ALL of the properties reported on by DAD have to have Read and Write access?  My assumption is that they do, but I&apos;ve not found any precise information yet that states this.  Thanks-</Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message><Replies><MessagesSelected>30</MessagesSelected><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4e852/0" level="1." new="yes">      <Author authinfo="Senior Project Engineer, VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.">ahopkins</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 7:15am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Here&apos;s the results of running the Unity Directory Access Diagnostics tool. Although I&apos;m having no problems importing accounts into Unity. I am having problems modifying those accounts once imported into Unity. I suspect the issues are a result of the unity directory services account not having the correct Read/Write access. Should the Unity Directory Services account have Read/Write access to ALL of the properties listed in the table below? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Property Name Read Write &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;ciscoEcsbuAlternateDTMFIds No No &lt;br /&gt;ciscoEcsbuAlternateDTMFIdsOrder No No &lt;br /&gt;ciscoEcsbuAmisDisableOutBound No No &lt;br /&gt;ciscoEcsbuDTMFId No No &lt;br /&gt;ciscoEcsbuListInUMDirectory No No &lt;br /&gt;ciscoEcsbuObjectType No No &lt;br /&gt;ciscoEcsbuTransferID No No &lt;br /&gt;ciscoEcsbuUMLocationObjectId No No &lt;br /&gt;ciscoEcsbuUndeleteable No No &lt;br /&gt;displayName Yes No &lt;br /&gt;facsimile TelephoneNumber Yes No &lt;br /&gt;givenName Yes No &lt;br /&gt;homeMDB Yes No &lt;br /&gt;homeMTA Yes No &lt;br /&gt;legacyExchangeDn Yes No &lt;br /&gt;mail Yes No &lt;br /&gt;mailNickname Yes No &lt;br /&gt;mDBOverHardQuotaLimit Yes No &lt;br /&gt;mDBOverQuotaLimit Yes No &lt;br /&gt;mDBStorageQuota Yes No &lt;br /&gt;mDBUseDefaults Yes No &lt;br /&gt;msExchHideFromAddress Yes No &lt;br /&gt;msExchRecordedName Yes No &lt;br /&gt;name Yes No &lt;br /&gt;objectGuid Yes No &lt;br /&gt;objectSid Yes No &lt;br /&gt;otherMailbox No No &lt;br /&gt;sidHistory Yes No &lt;br /&gt;sn Yes No &lt;br /&gt;targetAddress No No &lt;br /&gt;telephoneNumber No No &lt;br /&gt;unsChanged Yes No &lt;br /&gt;whenCreated No No &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message></Reply></Replies></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd4b71f" messages="3" subscribed="no" title="Unity 5 with Exchange, INetOrgPerson accounts"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4b71f" level="">            <Author authinfo=" Bucks New University">d.rickard@bcuc.ac.uk</Author><Timestamp>Oct 14, 2009, 2:32am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Hi,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Can unity support INetOrgPerson accounts? I&apos;ve got some accounts which are basically email only (hence being INetOrgPerson). When I try and add them in Unity I get the following error:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"An unrecognized error 0x800700005 has occurred: E_ACCESSDENIED. The new subscriber was not successfully added."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now, that suggests a permissions issue, but the permissions for that OU are correct, as is the mailbox store (checked those). Additionally, this line is logged on the Unity box:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;11:24:44:938,AvDiagnostics_MC,642,7320,-1,,ExchangeMonitor,10,MailboxDeleted(cn=hwlib cn=zzz ou=yyy o=xxx) failed; Unspecified error  ,0x00001C98&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Which is a little odd...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Could it still be permissions? I&apos;ve just run the PW check, and it looks OK - all the locations I need Unity to have rights on pass fine.</Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message><Replies><MessagesSelected>30</MessagesSelected><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4b71f/0" level="1." new="yes">            <Author authinfo=" DILLON IP COMMUNICATION SERVICES LLC">gkavan</Author><Timestamp>Oct 15, 2009, 6:50pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Hi -&lt;br /&gt;The Unity directory service account needs to update specific user/class attributes when importing a user into Unity.  I don&apos;t know without checking further if an INetOrgPerson account has the same attributes.  You can check a normal user account that has been successfully added to Unity using ADSIEdit to inspect the CiscoEcsbu_ specific attributes such as DTMFAccessID (user&apos;s extension) or other attributes and compare those to the INetOrgPerson account.  Other thing to check in ADUC is the Security tab of the account and ensure the Unitydirsvc account and Unitymsgstoresvc account have the necessary permissions.  And you can run SYSCHECK from the unity server, using the unitymsgstoresvc account to try adding a user.&lt;br /&gt;Ginger</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4b71f/1" level="1.1" new="yes">            <Author authinfo=" Bucks New University">d.rickard@bcuc.ac.uk</Author><Timestamp>Nov 11, 2009, 3:10am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Sorry for the slow reply. I thought I&apos;d set it to email me on reply!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The rights seem to be present. I&apos;ve checked the object in ADSI Edit, and none are present - which I&apos;d expect given that Unity hasn&apos;t touched this account. Telephone number is present, as are other fields it needs (names, etc).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So I&apos;m flummoxed!&lt;br /&gt;</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message></Reply><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4b71f/2" level="1.2" new="yes">      <Author authinfo="Senior Project Engineer, VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.">ahopkins</Author><Timestamp>Nov 16, 2009, 7:12am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Sorry, started to post to this thread by mistake</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message></Reply></Reply></Replies></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd4f033" messages="0" subscribed="no" title="To see Default.config file in TFTP"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4f033" level=""><Author authinfo=" QUOTNONE&amp;QUOT">aji_ece36</Author><Timestamp>Nov 15, 2009, 9:24pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Hi All,&lt;br /&gt;I want to see the Default.config file that is present in the TFTP server.&lt;br /&gt;Also is it possible to edit the default.config file through CUCM Web UI.,?&lt;br /&gt;It will be really helpful for me if anyone could provide the steps to do..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks in Advance,&lt;br /&gt;Aji</Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd4f012" messages="0" subscribed="no" title="UCCX Call Control Group randomness ? "><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4f012" level="">      <Author authinfo="SUPPORT, NETWORK TECHNOLOGY AUST PTY LTD">otn-cco</Author><Timestamp>Nov 15, 2009, 5:37pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>&lt;br /&gt;Hi,&lt;br /&gt;I have several applications each with their own Call Control Group in UCCX 5.0(2). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The problem is, if I call the application trigger, often different Call Control Groups seems to handle the call from what is specified in the trigger config. I have plenty of available sessions and CTI ports in all Call Control groups.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My understanding is that a trigger uses a specified Call Control group and that&apos;s that.. It should not grab ports from others..  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Any assistants appreciated. &lt;br /&gt;thanks. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Matt. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd40bfc" messages="2" subscribed="no" title="Business Attendant Console: No calls in queue"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd40bfc" level="">            <Author authinfo=" KERNEL CONTROL SRL">mariusstan</Author><Timestamp>Jul 6, 2009, 1:57am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Hello i installed a CCM 7.0 and Business Atendant Console 2.0.1.14. I installed everyrhing by the book. I receive no errors during the installation or after. So everything seems OK. The Operator logs in the console, the CTI ports and CTI Route Points are registered with CCM. The problem starts now: when the somebody calls to the route points ( DDI of the queues) even they ring the console shows no activity in the queues. Not even a brief call. So the Operator doesnt Know when a call is in or is it not in the queue. The only unusual thing i get are some errors in the TSP log:&lt;br /&gt;7/06/2009 12:43:43.470 CiscoTSP001.tsp|   CSelsiusTSPCall::CallAsyncFailureResponse() asyncResponseID=0x00000153 *ERROR* Reason for failure=0x8CCC00B4 (Invalid Feature Priority) dwRequestID=0x0001015A |&lt;LVL::Error&gt;&lt;MASK::0001&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have no other indication, in order to find any solution.&lt;br /&gt;And i repeat i have done everything by the book. I tested the lines with the Julmar phone.&lt;br /&gt;Do you have any advice? Is from TSP is from other place?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Best regards and thkx in advance.</Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message><Replies><MessagesSelected>30</MessagesSelected><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd40bfc/0" level="1." new="yes">            <Author authinfo=" COMPUSISCA SA">andresfmg</Author><Timestamp>Nov 6, 2009, 8:24pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>i have the same issue, did u resolved ?</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd40bfc/1" level="1.1" new="yes">            <Author authinfo=" JERSEY TELECOM">k-renouard</Author><Timestamp>Nov 15, 2009, 6:20am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>I have the same/or similar issue, has this been resolved.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If i call the Queue internally the Attendant sees the call and can work with it. If the call originates from the PSTN, hits a Translation profile to route the call to the same Queue, the Attendant does not see the call, the PSTN called just gets normal ringing.&lt;br /&gt;I know the translation profile works because i call route the same translation to an extension.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Where is the call?</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message></Reply></Reply></Replies></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd4efb1" messages="1" subscribed="no" title="Unity 5.x in a Voice Messaging Configuration with Exchange configuration"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4efb1" level="">            <Author authinfo=" SD">keithtudge</Author><Timestamp>Nov 15, 2009, 3:07am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>We&apos;ve set up our 2 Unity servers as per &lt;A HREF="javascript:newWin(&apos;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/unity/5x/installation/guide/vmexfo/5xcuigvmefo050.html&apos;)"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/unity/5x/installation/guide/vmexfo/5xcuigvmefo050.html&lt;/A&gt; - we have 2 servers,UNINTY01 as the primary and UNITY02 as the secondary. UNITY02 is the DC. In the above guide you have to reset the account that SQL Server Services logs on as to a domain account - On both the primary and secondary servers for Cisco Unity failover, you must reset the account that the MSSQLServer and SQLServerAgent services log on as. The account must be a domain account. However when you do this on the&lt;br /&gt;DC then when that server reboots, the services will surely fail on start up as the domain accounts cannot authenticate to the DC - how can the service accounts log in to the domain if the DC hasn&apos;t started yet??</Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message><Replies><MessagesSelected>30</MessagesSelected><Reply><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4efb1/0" level="1." new="yes">      <Author authinfo="AVVID TAC Engineer III, CISCO SYSTEMS">tstoutme</Author><Timestamp>Nov 15, 2009, 4:58am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Have you tried it to see? What I am getting at is that this has been tested or it wouldn&apos;t be recommended or allowed/supported by bu and tac. It used to not be and they tried it out, tested it thoroughly, and decided it was a valid option. We have people who use this scenario for failover all the time and have no issues. We have lab setups like this that also work with no problems.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tray&lt;br /&gt;</Msgbody><Attachment/></Message></Reply></Replies></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd4ef7a" messages="0" subscribed="no" title="TCP and UDP 5000-5020 DCOM RPC range after restriction"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4ef7a" level="">            <Author authinfo=" SFSU">aamercado</Author><Timestamp>Nov 14, 2009, 1:27pm PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Per&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;A HREF="javascript:newWin(&apos;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/unity/5x/security/guide/ex/5xcusec030e.html#wp1067900&apos;)"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/unity/5x/security/guide/ex/5xcusec030e.html#wp1067900&lt;/A&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is a general question - Do I just configure ports restriction 5000-20 on everything EXCEPT DC, GC, Exchange and Unity.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks</Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message></Conversation><Conversation id=".2cd4ef36" messages="0" subscribed="no" title="G.729 cluster communicating with a G.711 cluster"><Message attachment="no" canreply="yes" id=".2cd4ef36" level=""><Author authinfo=" Indian Airforce">kanherinoc</Author><Timestamp>Nov 14, 2009, 1:57am PST</Timestamp><Msgbody>Needed some information as to how can a G.729 cluster be made to call a G.711 cluster. What changes have to be done in the existing Gatekeepers which are handling G.711 communications.</Msgbody> <Attachment/></Message></Conversation></Topic></Forum></Community></ActiveMessages>')
